AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 675
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 20 times
- Been liked: 73 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Tell me about this deal Trump has struck with India……
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:47Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:40goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:37Why would I be embarrassed to have voted for the party which gained a huge majority? If I truly believed in them why would I be embarrassed? They won by a mile.
apparently because I can tell the difference between employer contributions and employee contribution that means I voted for them.
btw it was the conservatives who cut NI. Because I know that does that mean I voted for them as well?Pretty easy to sit there and have a debate as a so called neutral. I’ve been transparent from day one, you either stand for something or fall for anything.
We all know what you have fallen for. Good luck with that because it’s only gonna get a lot worse.Globalism for one. Liberalism for another or should I say Socialism.
Believing what your oppressive Gov’t are telling you. You know the Gov’t you are not allowed to criticize.
Liberal media and their constant fake news that you constantly repeat.
Your left wing brainwashed opinion of Trump. You’ll believe anything you read as long as it is Trump negative.
Yeah you’ve fallen for plenty.
I'm not sure you understand half the words you type.
socialism? I was the one defending a cut to benefits and you were criticising it!! Who’s the socialist?
You approach this stuff like supporting a football team, you’ll only ever support one side of anything depending on your team.
socialism? I was the one defending a cut to benefits and you were criticising it!! Who’s the socialist?
You approach this stuff like supporting a football team, you’ll only ever support one side of anything depending on your team.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:45So you’re comparing the uk agreeing a trade deal with India to Apple re jigging their shipments destination to avoid Trumps tariffs?
yes I laughed about it because it made him look silly for claiming that the US was going to produce iPhones.
No you made a big deal about it at the time. My position has always been I’d rather the US move all Chinese trade to India, it makes the world of sense.
Apple has announced a $500 billion investment into the USA so don’t know why you’d laugh at Trump?
what it shows is you’ve been brainwashed with TDS from the fake news networks you pretend you don’t listen to.
Just another example of your true colours you are trying desperately to hide……Coward! Own it at least you’d have some self respect.
Apple has announced a $500 billion investment into the USA so don’t know why you’d laugh at Trump?
what it shows is you’ve been brainwashed with TDS from the fake news networks you pretend you don’t listen to.
Just another example of your true colours you are trying desperately to hide……Coward! Own it at least you’d have some self respect.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:40goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:37Why would I be embarrassed to have voted for the party which gained a huge majority? If I truly believed in them why would I be embarrassed? They won by a mile.
apparently because I can tell the difference between employer contributions and employee contribution that means I voted for them.
btw it was the conservatives who cut NI. Because I know that does that mean I voted for them as well?Pretty easy to sit there and have a debate as a so called neutral. I’ve been transparent from day one, you either stand for something or fall for anything.
We all know what you have fallen for. Good luck with that because it’s only gonna get a lot worse.
Globalism for one. Liberalism for another or should I say Socialism.
Believing what your oppressive Gov’t are telling you. You know the Gov’t you are not allowed to criticize.
Liberal media and their constant fake news that you constantly repeat.
Your left wing brainwashed opinion of Trump. You’ll believe anything you read as long as it is Trump negative.
Yeah you’ve fallen for plenty.
Believing what your oppressive Gov’t are telling you. You know the Gov’t you are not allowed to criticize.
Liberal media and their constant fake news that you constantly repeat.
Your left wing brainwashed opinion of Trump. You’ll believe anything you read as long as it is Trump negative.
Yeah you’ve fallen for plenty.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:42I phones being built in India now for the American meat remember?
This was when all you had to argue was I phone production and nothing else. Probably a few pages back on this thread.
OR are you gonna lie again and pretend you didn’t mock Trump for the deal?
So you’re comparing the uk agreeing a trade deal with India to Apple re jigging their shipments destination to avoid Trumps tariffs?
yes I laughed about it because it made him look silly for claiming that the US was going to produce iPhones.
yes I laughed about it because it made him look silly for claiming that the US was going to produce iPhones.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I phones being built in India now for the American meat remember?
This was when all you had to argue was I phone production and nothing else. Probably a few pages back on this thread.
OR are you gonna lie again and pretend you didn’t mock Trump for the deal?
This was when all you had to argue was I phone production and nothing else. Probably a few pages back on this thread.
OR are you gonna lie again and pretend you didn’t mock Trump for the deal?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:40goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:37Why would I be embarrassed to have voted for the party which gained a huge majority? If I truly believed in them why would I be embarrassed? They won by a mile.
apparently because I can tell the difference between employer contributions and employee contribution that means I voted for them.
btw it was the conservatives who cut NI. Because I know that does that mean I voted for them as well?Pretty easy to sit there and have a debate as a so called neutral. I’ve been transparent from day one, you either stand for something or fall for anything.
We all know what you have fallen for. Good luck with that because it’s only gonna get a lot worse.
Sorry what have I fallen for?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:37Why would I be embarrassed to have voted for the party which gained a huge majority? If I truly believed in them why would I be embarrassed? They won by a mile.
apparently because I can tell the difference between employer contributions and employee contribution that means I voted for them.
btw it was the conservatives who cut NI. Because I know that does that mean I voted for them as well?
Pretty easy to sit there and have a debate as a so called neutral. I’ve been transparent from day one, you either stand for something or fall for anything.
We all know what you have fallen for. Good luck with that because it’s only gonna get a lot worse.
We all know what you have fallen for. Good luck with that because it’s only gonna get a lot worse.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
What deal has Trump agreed with India?
Apple already produce iPhones in India. They switched their shipments destination to avoid paying the Chinese tariffs.
Apple already produce iPhones in India. They switched their shipments destination to avoid paying the Chinese tariffs.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:32No all along you’ve been fence sitting pretending to lean right, however it’s apparent that isn’t the case. You’re just embarrassed to admit it because you know it’s a losing hand.
I got you from day one.
Why would I be embarrassed to have voted for the party which gained a huge majority? If I truly believed in them why would I be embarrassed? They won by a mile.
apparently because I can tell the difference between employer contributions and employee contribution that means I voted for them.
btw it was the conservatives who cut NI. Because I know that does that mean I voted for them as well?
apparently because I can tell the difference between employer contributions and employee contribution that means I voted for them.
btw it was the conservatives who cut NI. Because I know that does that mean I voted for them as well?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Starmer strikes a deal with India and it’s good biz
Trump strikes a deal with India and he’s making India great again.
Have a word with yourself, you look ridiculous!
Trump strikes a deal with India and he’s making India great again.
Have a word with yourself, you look ridiculous!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:22Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:20goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:01No more desperate for a trade deal than Trump is I would say. Who wouldn’t want a mutually beneficial deal with the fastest growing economy in the G20.
The UK economy actually grew more than the US in Q1 although that’s nothing to write home about.
As for taxation, no it hasn’t gone up. It actually went down last year. Employer contributions have gone up.
If you look at taxation + healthcare contributions as a % of GDP the U.K. is pretty much in line with the USA.Sounds like you’re a bit defensive. Your true colours are shining through. Confirms everything Ive been saying about you. Your dirty little secret is out!My dirty little secret that I can read some numbers off a graph or table? Or that I understand when taxes go down instead of up?
Yeh you got me there.
No all along you’ve been fence sitting pretending to lean right, however it’s apparent that isn’t the case. You’re just embarrassed to admit it because you know it’s a losing hand.
I got you from day one.
I got you from day one.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:21Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:20goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:01No more desperate for a trade deal than Trump is I would say. Who wouldn’t want a mutually beneficial deal with the fastest growing economy in the G20.
The UK economy actually grew more than the US in Q1 although that’s nothing to write home about.
As for taxation, no it hasn’t gone up. It actually went down last year. Employer contributions have gone up.
If you look at taxation + healthcare contributions as a % of GDP the U.K. is pretty much in line with the USA.Sounds like you’re a bit defensive. Your true colours are shining through. Confirms everything Ive been saying about you. Your dirty little secret is out!I’ll take Trump over Starmer any day of the week.
I’ll take neither thanks.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:20goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:01Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 20:34Because he needs a win bad after the elections and the economy is on life support, plus there is the cost of immigration that is gonna continue to rise as more and more pile in. They are already raising N I contributions, taxation is through the roof and benefits are getting cut. Desperate times call for desperate measures.No more desperate for a trade deal than Trump is I would say. Who wouldn’t want a mutually beneficial deal with the fastest growing economy in the G20.
The UK economy actually grew more than the US in Q1 although that’s nothing to write home about.
As for taxation, no it hasn’t gone up. It actually went down last year. Employer contributions have gone up.
If you look at taxation + healthcare contributions as a % of GDP the U.K. is pretty much in line with the USA.Sounds like you’re a bit defensive. Your true colours are shining through. Confirms everything Ive been saying about you. Your dirty little secret is out!
My dirty little secret that I can read some numbers off a graph or table? Or that I understand when taxes go down instead of up?
Yeh you got me there.
Yeh you got me there.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:20goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:01Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 20:34Because he needs a win bad after the elections and the economy is on life support, plus there is the cost of immigration that is gonna continue to rise as more and more pile in. They are already raising N I contributions, taxation is through the roof and benefits are getting cut. Desperate times call for desperate measures.No more desperate for a trade deal than Trump is I would say. Who wouldn’t want a mutually beneficial deal with the fastest growing economy in the G20.
The UK economy actually grew more than the US in Q1 although that’s nothing to write home about.
As for taxation, no it hasn’t gone up. It actually went down last year. Employer contributions have gone up.
If you look at taxation + healthcare contributions as a % of GDP the U.K. is pretty much in line with the USA.Sounds like you’re a bit defensive. Your true colours are shining through. Confirms everything Ive been saying about you. Your dirty little secret is out!
I’ll take Trump over Starmer any day of the week.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 21:01Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 20:34Because he needs a win bad after the elections and the economy is on life support, plus there is the cost of immigration that is gonna continue to rise as more and more pile in. They are already raising N I contributions, taxation is through the roof and benefits are getting cut. Desperate times call for desperate measures.No more desperate for a trade deal than Trump is I would say. Who wouldn’t want a mutually beneficial deal with the fastest growing economy in the G20.
The UK economy actually grew more than the US in Q1 although that’s nothing to write home about.
As for taxation, no it hasn’t gone up. It actually went down last year. Employer contributions have gone up.
If you look at taxation + healthcare contributions as a % of GDP the U.K. is pretty much in line with the USA.
Sounds like you’re a bit defensive. Your true colours are shining through. Confirms everything Ive been saying about you. Your dirty little secret is out!
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 20:34goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 20:22Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:39No harm in verifying Goose son. I mean it’s not like they haven’t lied before now is it?
After the shocking results of recent elections Starmer needed a win so the timing seems perfect to deflect from the reality of the misery they are causing.
Just curious to know the level of desperation and concessions given up to get it.What makes you think it was desperation?Because he needs a win bad after the elections and the economy is on life support, plus there is the cost of immigration that is gonna continue to rise as more and more pile in. They are already raising N I contributions, taxation is through the roof and benefits are getting cut. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
No more desperate for a trade deal than Trump is I would say. Who wouldn’t want a mutually beneficial deal with the fastest growing economy in the G20.
The UK economy actually grew more than the US in Q1 although that’s nothing to write home about.
As for taxation, no it hasn’t gone up. It actually went down last year. Employer contributions have gone up.
If you look at taxation + healthcare contributions as a % of GDP the U.K. is pretty much in line with the USA.
The UK economy actually grew more than the US in Q1 although that’s nothing to write home about.
As for taxation, no it hasn’t gone up. It actually went down last year. Employer contributions have gone up.
If you look at taxation + healthcare contributions as a % of GDP the U.K. is pretty much in line with the USA.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 20:22Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:39No harm in verifying Goose son. I mean it’s not like they haven’t lied before now is it?
After the shocking results of recent elections Starmer needed a win so the timing seems perfect to deflect from the reality of the misery they are causing.
Just curious to know the level of desperation and concessions given up to get it.What makes you think it was desperation?
Because he needs a win bad after the elections and the economy is on life support, plus there is the cost of immigration that is gonna continue to rise as more and more pile in. They are already raising N I contributions, taxation is through the roof and benefits are getting cut. Desperate times call for desperate measures.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:39goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:28Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:18So I see they are citing “Indian sources” Guess we will have to wait for the details of the agreement to be published to find out the reality. Hopefully this report isn’t more lies.
Personally I prefer the UK and USA to trade with India instead of China, so I like the concept. Although I think most would agree any concessions on N I contributions to any particular group would be unacceptable.It’s widely reported and was confirmed by the trade minister this morning. It’s a fact.
The same terms are offered to people from many other countries. Why should they be paying into a pension when they’re only here temporarily and cannot claim a state pension?No harm in verifying Goose son. I mean it’s not like they haven’t lied before now is it?
After the shocking results of recent elections Starmer needed a win so the timing seems perfect to deflect from the reality of the misery they are causing.
Just curious to know the level of desperation and concessions given up to get it.
What makes you think it was desperation?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:28Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:18goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:03https://www.ft.com/content/7f1337ff-5e3 ... c592918323
- Labour Mobility: The agreement includes a provision exempting Indian professionals temporarily seconded to the UK from national insurance contributions for up to three years.
So I see they are citing “Indian sources” Guess we will have to wait for the details of the agreement to be published to find out the reality. Hopefully this report isn’t more lies.
Personally I prefer the UK and USA to trade with India instead of China, so I like the concept. Although I think most would agree any concessions on N I contributions to any particular group would be unacceptable.It’s widely reported and was confirmed by the trade minister this morning. It’s a fact.
The same terms are offered to people from many other countries. Why should they be paying into a pension when they’re only here temporarily and cannot claim a state pension?
No harm in verifying Goose son. I mean it’s not like they haven’t lied before now is it?
After the shocking results of recent elections Starmer needed a win so the timing seems perfect to deflect from the reality of the misery they are causing.
Just curious to know the level of desperation and concessions given up to get it.
After the shocking results of recent elections Starmer needed a win so the timing seems perfect to deflect from the reality of the misery they are causing.
Just curious to know the level of desperation and concessions given up to get it.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Nutsin wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:18goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:03https://www.ft.com/content/7f1337ff-5e3 ... c592918323
- Labour Mobility: The agreement includes a provision exempting Indian professionals temporarily seconded to the UK from national insurance contributions for up to three years.
So I see they are citing “Indian sources” Guess we will have to wait for the details of the agreement to be published to find out the reality. Hopefully this report isn’t more lies.
Personally I prefer the UK and USA to trade with India instead of China, so I like the concept. Although I think most would agree any concessions on N I contributions to any particular group would be unacceptable.
It’s widely reported and was confirmed by the trade minister this morning. It’s a fact.
The same terms are offered to people from many other countries. Why should they be paying into a pension when they’re only here temporarily and cannot claim a state pension?
The same terms are offered to people from many other countries. Why should they be paying into a pension when they’re only here temporarily and cannot claim a state pension?
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:03https://www.ft.com/content/7f1337ff-5e3 ... c592918323
- Labour Mobility: The agreement includes a provision exempting Indian professionals temporarily seconded to the UK from national insurance contributions for up to three years.
So I see they are citing “Indian sources” Guess we will have to wait for the details of the agreement to be published to find out the reality. Hopefully this report isn’t more lies.
Personally I prefer the UK and USA to trade with India instead of China, so I like the concept. Although I think most would agree any concessions on N I contributions to any particular group would be unacceptable.
Personally I prefer the UK and USA to trade with India instead of China, so I like the concept. Although I think most would agree any concessions on N I contributions to any particular group would be unacceptable.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
goose wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 19:03https://www.ft.com/content/7f1337ff-5e3 ... c592918323
- Labour Mobility: The agreement includes a provision exempting Indian professionals temporarily seconded to the UK from national insurance contributions for up to three years.
So if it really kicks off between India and Pakistan does that mean the UK will be accepting even more Indian and Pakistani refugees?