AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Iran v Israel
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Iran v Israel
Israel struck Iran last night.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
Iran hit back tonight.
Israel is bombing Iran now.
Hope Iran wins, tbh. No more wars for Israel.
-
- Posts: 2674
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 42 times
- Been liked: 263 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Have mentioned before I have no problem with terrorist states having their nuclear capabilities knocked out
Could probably do Pakistan next
Would also have no problem with the Ayatollah’s being knocked out so the Iranian people (especially women) can live in the 21st century
I don’t believe ANYONE wants to live under this sort of backwards 14th century regime administered by beardy fuckwits
If Iran are going to retaliate they should target Trump Tower, Trump Casino’s & Trump golf courses
Could probably do Pakistan next
Would also have no problem with the Ayatollah’s being knocked out so the Iranian people (especially women) can live in the 21st century
I don’t believe ANYONE wants to live under this sort of backwards 14th century regime administered by beardy fuckwits
If Iran are going to retaliate they should target Trump Tower, Trump Casino’s & Trump golf courses
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
I see Tehran has now warned of "everlasting consequences", so:
Banging your head on the doormat II: This Time We Really (REALLY) mean it.
I feel a franchise in the making here.
Banging your head on the doormat II: This Time We Really (REALLY) mean it.
I feel a franchise in the making here.
-
- Posts: 240
- Old WHO Number: 220787
- Has liked: 10 times
- Been liked: 26 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Have no worries people, the voice of sense, reason and every right thinking person that is Starmer has told them all to fucking chill out and have a cuppa and cakes together.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑21 Jun 2025, 14:11 Get Mike ‘Terry Waite’ over to Trump Gaza to offer his words of wisdom with some Sunny Mann goggles on. Wanker
Get BerlingtonBertie over to Gaza to amuse the kids with his words of gibberish. Matters not that they can't speak the King's English as he clearly cannot, either.
-
- Posts: 1694
- Old WHO Number: 33051
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 290 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Problem with Iran is that it's as much an ideology as a regime, they despise the West and see killing us as all ok, how anyone in the West can support or defend them is incomprehensible IMO.
See some of the shit they did during the war with Iraq was frightening, around 20,000 (Twenty thousand) children used as suicide bombers or sent into mine fields before the Army went through and an estimated near half a million school aged children conscripted, many of whom would have been killed, NO parental permission was needed as decreed by the ayatollahs.
Iran’s sickening use of child soldiers - JNS.org
Brainwashing Children into martyrdom is presented by the ayatollahs as an extension of the Shia mythology surrounding the 680 CE Battle of Karbala, which was the Big Bang of the Sunni-Shia conflict and a model for martyrdom.
During the battle, Hussain ibn Ali, the third Shia Imam and grandson of Muhammad, and his warriors—including children—were betrayed and massacred by the Sunni Caliph Yazid.
Using children for martyrdom purposes was commonplace during the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War, during which children were used for mine-sweeping and other suicide missions.According to the Geneva-based Refworld, an arm of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, “[Iranian] child soldiers, some as young as nine, were used extensively during the Iran-Iraq war. …
They were given ‘keys to paradise’ and promised that they would go directly to heaven if they died as martyrs against the Iraqi enemy.”
See some of the shit they did during the war with Iraq was frightening, around 20,000 (Twenty thousand) children used as suicide bombers or sent into mine fields before the Army went through and an estimated near half a million school aged children conscripted, many of whom would have been killed, NO parental permission was needed as decreed by the ayatollahs.
Iran’s sickening use of child soldiers - JNS.org
Brainwashing Children into martyrdom is presented by the ayatollahs as an extension of the Shia mythology surrounding the 680 CE Battle of Karbala, which was the Big Bang of the Sunni-Shia conflict and a model for martyrdom.
During the battle, Hussain ibn Ali, the third Shia Imam and grandson of Muhammad, and his warriors—including children—were betrayed and massacred by the Sunni Caliph Yazid.
Using children for martyrdom purposes was commonplace during the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War, during which children were used for mine-sweeping and other suicide missions.According to the Geneva-based Refworld, an arm of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, “[Iranian] child soldiers, some as young as nine, were used extensively during the Iran-Iraq war. …
They were given ‘keys to paradise’ and promised that they would go directly to heaven if they died as martyrs against the Iraqi enemy.”
Re: Iran v Israel
the beardies days are numbered, regime change is definitely on the cards. I'll give Khamenei a week tops before he has to meet the man/woman/trans.
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑21 Jun 2025, 14:11 Get Mike ‘Terry Waite’ over to Trump Gaza to offer his words of wisdom with some Sunny Mann goggles on. Wanker
U S B 2 Bombers bombed 3 Iranian Nuclear
plants!
So US is now involved.
So US is now involved.
-
- Posts: 91
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 19 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Get Mike ‘Terry Waite’ over to Trump Gaza to offer his words of wisdom with some Sunny Mann goggles on. Wanker
-
- Posts: 77
- Location: Caribbean Island 🌞
- Old WHO Number: 265443
- Has liked: 402 times
- Been liked: 15 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Big difference though between firing indiscriminately at civilians & aimed targeting of rocket launchers cynically hidden underneath or within schools &
hospitals .
hospitals .
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3353
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 15:20 You believe everything Israel says? The very first casualty in war, is the truth.
And do you believe everything Hamas says? I have no strong opinion on it until all the facts come out, so keeping an open mind on it. Especially when it comes to Hamas more than Israel.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 985
- Has liked: 276 times
- Been liked: 422 times
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3353
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 14:32 I've got no favouritism either way in the two sides but I did find it highly ironic that when one of Iran's missiles hit an Israeli hospital they were all saying war crime, war crime and yet that's what the Israelis have been doing to the hospitals in Gaza pretty much at will.
It could well be war crimes committed. Israel claim that Hamas have military operations situated in and around a lot of hospital sites, so the evidence at some point will need to be proved by Israel.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 985
- Has liked: 276 times
- Been liked: 422 times
Re: Iran v Israel
I've got no favouritism either way in the two sides but I did find it highly ironic that when one of Iran's missiles hit an Israeli hospital they were all saying war crime, war crime and yet that's what the Israelis have been doing to the hospitals in Gaza pretty much at will.
-
- Posts: 74
- Has liked: 7 times
- Been liked: 32 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 13:24 The thing with taking out the Iran regime is it'll severely effect and weaken all the proxy shit going on in the region as it's them that funds, arms and trains up the terrorist groups of Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas with also links to the Taliban/Al-quaeda which has been so destructive to the region for so long.
Cutting the head off the snake that's caused so much shit down the years seems too good an opportunity to turn up now, as well as fucking up their nuclear capabilites.
Now Israel has gone this far, they may as well just snuff the chief raghead and as many of his henchman as possible so the people can finally rise up.
Could be the wrong move and there's a better way of going about it all but that's the way I see it, so in for a penny..
the baby killers can't do it on their own, so they're running to trump.
melts.
melts.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 3353
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 1813 times
- Been liked: 885 times
Re: Iran v Israel
The thing with taking out the Iran regime is it'll severely effect and weaken all the proxy shit going on in the region as it's them that funds, arms and trains up the terrorist groups of Hezbollah, Houthis, Hamas with also links to the Taliban/Al-quaeda which has been so destructive to the region for so long.
Cutting the head off the snake that's caused so much shit down the years seems too good an opportunity to turn up now, as well as fucking up their nuclear capabilites.
Now Israel has gone this far, they may as well just snuff the chief raghead and as many of his henchman as possible so the people can finally rise up.
Could be the wrong move and there's a better way of going about it all but that's the way I see it, so in for a penny..
Cutting the head off the snake that's caused so much shit down the years seems too good an opportunity to turn up now, as well as fucking up their nuclear capabilites.
Now Israel has gone this far, they may as well just snuff the chief raghead and as many of his henchman as possible so the people can finally rise up.
Could be the wrong move and there's a better way of going about it all but that's the way I see it, so in for a penny..
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3085
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 439 times
Re: Iran v Israel
I wouldn't want to stick up for either of these sides, but I find it REALLY incredible that people are willing to throw their support behind Iran in all this, well the ones that live in the West anyway.
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 12:27 Mike - i’d like to stick those crayons in your eyes and nose and smash your head against a table you boring cսnt.
Simple rag rhetoric - why launch a nuke when you know it will be responded to and you will be wiped out - doesn't make sense.
But you rather believe the yanks who always speak the truth…. They had no luck going down holes in ‘Nam and Afghanistan so let’s see if they can take out the big Iranian hole and further destabilise the region.
why blow yourself up with a suicide vest, stop trying to apply logic to fanatics
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
BerlingtonBertie wrote: ↑20 Jun 2025, 12:27 Mike - i’d like to stick those crayons in your eyes and nose and smash your head against a table you boring cսnt.
Simple rag rhetoric - why launch a nuke when you know it will be responded to and you will be wiped out - doesn't make sense.
But you rather believe the yanks who always speak the truth…. They had no luck going down holes in ‘Nam and Afghanistan so let’s see if they can take out the big Iranian hole and further destabilise the region.
I've already pointed out that the religious rag-heads (as YOU call them) don't give a fig if them attacking Israel results in the total obliteration of their own country and society as their belief convinces them that they (but, strangely enough, not their perceived enemy) will rise, like a phoenix from the ashes, to dominate the world.
Everybody becomes a martyr for them in such a scenario.
You can't beat beliefs.
Everybody becomes a martyr for them in such a scenario.
You can't beat beliefs.
-
- Posts: 91
- Has liked: 4 times
- Been liked: 19 times
Re: Iran v Israel
Mike - i’d like to stick those crayons in your eyes and nose and smash your head against a table you boring cսnt.
Simple rag rhetoric - why launch a nuke when you know it will be responded to and you will be wiped out - doesn't make sense.
But you rather believe the yanks who always speak the truth…. They had no luck going down holes in ‘Nam and Afghanistan so let’s see if they can take out the big Iranian hole and further destabilise the region.
Simple rag rhetoric - why launch a nuke when you know it will be responded to and you will be wiped out - doesn't make sense.
But you rather believe the yanks who always speak the truth…. They had no luck going down holes in ‘Nam and Afghanistan so let’s see if they can take out the big Iranian hole and further destabilise the region.
- WHU(Exeter)
- Posts: 1312
- Old WHO Number: 13669
- Has liked: 75 times
- Been liked: 127 times
Re: Iran v Israel
If only there could've been an agreement in place whereas Iran was sticking to agreed upon levels, which were being ratified by the ICEA regularly.
oh...
oh...
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 3964
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 16 times
- Been liked: 394 times
Re: Iran v Israel
My understanding is that Iran already possess enough Uranium to a sufficient purity to meet it's civilian nuclear power requirements, so there is no commercial need or requirement to improve on that purity.
So why do it?
Or why be coy on whether or not you're doing it?
Given the massive oil/gas revenue Iran generates each year, spending so much on a product you don't need nor have any use for still makes no sense whatsoever.
So the question is: "Do they actually have a (planned) use for Uranium at that higher level of purity?
Even if the chance of them purifying enough to make a viable atom bomb is minuscule, it's not zero, so there IS such a possibility.
Given that is the case, then a potential impact assessment (in addition to the prior risk assessment) needs to be undertaken.
Anyone care to guess what the impact is of an atom bomb being dropped on Israel? Could fuck up your holidays in the Med for centuries to come, for one. How big a bucket of cսnt is that?
So why do it?
Or why be coy on whether or not you're doing it?
Given the massive oil/gas revenue Iran generates each year, spending so much on a product you don't need nor have any use for still makes no sense whatsoever.
So the question is: "Do they actually have a (planned) use for Uranium at that higher level of purity?
Even if the chance of them purifying enough to make a viable atom bomb is minuscule, it's not zero, so there IS such a possibility.
Given that is the case, then a potential impact assessment (in addition to the prior risk assessment) needs to be undertaken.
Anyone care to guess what the impact is of an atom bomb being dropped on Israel? Could fuck up your holidays in the Med for centuries to come, for one. How big a bucket of cսnt is that?