The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

[Come On You Irons]

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

[THUNDERCLINT]

Police have footage of the killer who appears to be of college age
They have recovered the weapon … a high powered bolt action rifle
In what universe does a citizen need such a weapon?
Has Trump announced control of entirely unnecessary weapons yet?
If not why not?

 

 

Shut up you fucking retard. I  used to target shoot and kept similar rifles at home in the UK, as do many others.

The rifles aren't the problems anymore than a knife or a bag of fertilizer is.

it 's the failure to institutionalize loons because liberal's don't like that causes all this shit.


 

OK Rambo, how much damage do you reckon you could do with a Rifle compared to a knife before you're tackled to the floor? and how capable is the average inbreed capable of making a fertiliser bomb? I will say there's a logical reason for owning a bolt action, ie hunting, but people tend to go full retard when they try and justify owning assault rifles 

 

 

If some is close enough to tackle you then you'll do no damage with a long gun. You'll never raise it and sight it in time.

All 3 are basically inanimate objects they present no danger by themselves, same as a car, a hammer, a length of rope or a pointy stick.

The problem is 70 years of moronic liberal policy on the detention and treatment of mentals. 

[Mr Anon]

It doesn't actually really matter what Kirk's belief's were. Anyone on here or anywhere else stating his comments were inflammatory and hence almost saying "he had it coming" are woefully missing the point.

Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally. 

That's the problem. The extreme hard Left are incapable of logic, sense and rational when they are unable to argue back. 

Kirk gave millions of people a platform to debate. Whatever their views were. But ultimately, the views are irrelevant. Its the actions that count. And the actions of that shooter and some of the scum bags celebrating show you all you need to know about the state of the Left. 

 

 

I agree with all that, but goes without saying an "extreme hard" anything is incapable of logic, like the extreme hard right who are more concerned their favourite toys might be taken away, than the erosion of free speech and a public murder

[Lee Trundle]

and how capable is the average inbreed capable of making a fertiliser bomb?  

They were able to make one for the Manchester Arena bombing.

Anyone remember the Anarchists Cookbook?

[Mr Anon]

Police have footage of the killer who appears to be of college age
They have recovered the weapon … a high powered bolt action rifle
In what universe does a citizen need such a weapon?
Has Trump announced control of entirely unnecessary weapons yet?
If not why not?

 

 

Shut up you fucking retard. I  used to target shoot and kept similar rifles at home in the UK, as do many others.

The rifles aren't the problems anymore than a knife or a bag of fertilizer is.

it 's the failure to institutionalize loons because liberal's don't like that causes all this shit.
 

OK Rambo, how much damage do you reckon you could do with a Rifle compared to a knife before you're tackled to the floor? and how capable is the average inbreed capable of making a fertiliser bomb? I will say there's a logical reason for owning a bolt action, ie hunting, but people tend to go full retard when they try and justify owning assault rifles 

[Mad Dog]

"The rifles aren't the problems anymore than a knife or a bag of fertilizer is."

i dont agree with that.  Difficult to kill someone with a knife from 200 meters a la charlie kirk

Also you dont get semi automatic knives that can cut down 20 people in a room in seconds

[Vexed]

Pretty much, Bill.

The Demonicrats and the like have somehow managed to convince themselves Charlie Kirk (and Trump) was the devil incarnate, when in actual fact they were projecting their own demons on to him. All proper weird shit. 

I think like Eerie/Trundle touched on earlier, it's ego that has also played a part in hiw twisted they have got over Kirk when debating him. These are supposed to be the clever cunts of the class with the moral high ground and when challenged by a switched on geezer like Kirk, it fucked with their heads as they couldn't stomach losing so many debates that happened on their manor at Uni. 

You seem a little overinvested in this. 

Yeah, not like it isn't a huge political news story about a cause I strongly believe in with regards to free speech. 

 

 

How long you been strongly believing in this cause? Bout two weeks? Right on comrade, with yer fucking shed full of tinned food and weapons made out of bread sticks. What a fuckin tit. 

[THUNDERCLINT]

Police have footage of the killer who appears to be of college age
They have recovered the weapon … a high powered bolt action rifle
In what universe does a citizen need such a weapon?
Has Trump announced control of entirely unnecessary weapons yet?
If not why not?

 

 

 

Shut up you fucking retard. I  used to target shoot and kept similar rifles at home in the UK, as do many others.

The rifles aren't the problems anymore than a knife or a bag of fertilizer is.

it 's the failure to institutionalize loons because liberal's don't like that causes all this shit.

[Lee Trundle]

You watch the press jump over anything on the 13th September, if there's a bit of fisticuffs or something.

Telling everyone who's stupid enough to listen that the violence and aggression comes from those nasty, mean people who dare to wave the flag of the country the live in.

[Jaan Kenbrovin]

Even if the US banned guns, it wouldn't stop assassinations, or random killing  of women and children out of spite.

These lunatics will always find a way. 
 

[BRANDED]

Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally. 

Can someone advise us on how to debate with someone whose views are predicated on a god who has bestowed rights on people. How, for example, is believing your existence and actions are governed by a God at all rational?

 

 

ParsimonyThe parsimony principle (lex parsimoniae in Latin) is typically connected with classic Occam razor in philosophy, which states that entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity. Hence, whenever we have different explanations of the observed data, the simplest one is preferable.

God is by far the simplest.

[Lee Trundle]

The likes of Sven would be the first to kick up a stink over there if people like him get their gun taken away, and I don't.

[BRANDED]

Because they have a right to own a weapon 

Not shoot people.

 

[Fauxstralian]

Police have footage of the killer who appears to be of college age
They have recovered the weapon … a high powered bolt action rifle
In what universe does a citizen need such a weapon?
Has Trump announced control of entirely unnecessary weapons yet?
If not why not?

[One Sunny Day]

 

And what is this Christian perspective on homosexuality he took? Please tell us. Did it involve free will to be stoned to death?

 

hmmm, out of interest... what is you take on the hanging, stoning, & throwing-off buildings/mountains of homosexuals in certain Muslim countries?... that is fact, what Mr. Kirk said (or didn't say) was hearsay, would you not agree?

I wasn't a follower, he was too religious for me in his thinking that said, he always came across as reasoned & non-violent.

I think it's wrong and bad. Now back to what you think of this dead prick saying gays should be stoned to death?...

[Lee Trundle]

Have we found this stoning to death quote from the disgusting pig Kirk, who never committed a single crime or act of violence, yet?

I've just got to double check which way my compass should be pointing after seeing it..  

I'm probably as far from what this guy stood for a you can get. There is a clip of him talking about stoning homosexuals to death but it is easily taken out of context. It was part of a conversation with someone who had quoted a passage from the bible (which we don't hear) and his response was to quote the biblical text about stoning to death a man who lay with another man or some such. As ever when it comes to the bible a load of baloney but it wasn't presented as Kirk's opinion.

If that's the statement One Sunny They was thinking of when he came out with that, then he's part of the big problem.  He'd be peddling misinformation, like the mainstream media do.

But I'm hoping for They's sake, that They comes up with an actual statement cementing They's view (I hope that makes sense to all the normal people here).

[John Drake]

Have we found this stoning to death quote from the disgusting pig Kirk, who never committed a single crime or act of violence, yet?

I've just got to double check which way my compass should be pointing after seeing it..  

I'm probably as far from what this guy stood for a you can get. There is a clip of him talking about stoning homosexuals to death but it is easily taken out of context. It was part of a conversation with someone who had quoted a passage from the bible (which we don't hear) and his response was to quote the biblical text about stoning to death a man who lay with another man or some such. As ever when it comes to the bible a load of baloney but it wasn't presented as Kirk's opinion.

[THUNDERCLINT]

It doesn't actually really matter what Kirk's belief's were. Anyone on here or anywhere else stating his comments were inflammatory and hence almost saying "he had it coming" are woefully missing the point.

Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally. 

That's the problem. The extreme hard Left are incapable of logic, sense and rational when they are unable to argue back. 

Kirk gave millions of people a platform to debate. Whatever their views were. But ultimately, the views are irrelevant. Its the actions that count. And the actions of that shooter and some of the scum bags celebrating show you all you need to know about the state of the Left. 

2/1 the shooter turns out to be a retarded npc he made look ridiculous whose sub normal intellect couldn't cope with it's 15 minutes of shame.

[Massive Attack]

Have we found this stoning to death quote from the disgusting pig Kirk, who never committed a single crime or act of violence, yet?

I've just got to double check which way my compass should be pointing after seeing it..  

[Nutsin]

Charlie Kirk said that a few gun deaths was acceptable to keep gun laws as they are. I strongly disagree and am glad you now feel the same 

I think it would be wise if you just shut the fuck up until we find out who and why it happened.

To politicize it is disgusting, but then when it comes to you it’s not surprising. 

 

But here you were, emidiately blaming it on lefties, without any evidence 

Care to show me where I was blaming it on lefties?

I’ll wait.

[Come On You Irons]

No one deserves to die for expressing their beliefs but he sounds like a typical MAGA mouth breather with no respect for anyone not of his ilk
Like Trump 
He is hardly Martin Luther King is he?
Thats the Martin Luther King he described as a myth when telling us that enacting the Civil Rights Act was a ‘huge mistake’

What an appalling comment. A new depth sunk to by Sven, the fake plastic Aussie.

[only1billybonds]

Comma.

I very much doubt that Mr Kirk needed  God to tell him that there are only 2 genders and that men can't conceive.

[Massive Attack]

Oh yeah, that massive bigoted, misogynistic, racist God and his crew. Jesus Christ...

[,]

Bottom line is, he always offered his opinion and views in a sensible and rational manner - And he always allowed people with differing views to air them and he would listen and respond accordingly but always rationally. 

Can someone advise us on how to debate with someone whose views are predicated on a god who has bestowed rights on people. How, for example, is believing your existence and actions are governed by a God at all rational?

[violator]

Didn't he quote a passage from the bible about it, or something like that?

[Lee Trundle]

Charlie Kirk publicly endorsed stoning people to death for being gay. The hypocrisy of some here, getting outraged at others not caring about his death, is a sight to behold.


 

One sunny day
Doubt he did that.  Can you back up that claim with an actual quote?

I, too, would like to see this, They-son?