AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Max Kilman
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1020
- Has liked: 161 times
- Been liked: 467 times
Max Kilman
This lad is a real problem.
At £40mil, it's getting to the point of worst ever signing territory. The worst crime in football is hiding, centre back is probably the one position you can half get away with it, but not for too long. Shirks taking responsibility, who imo makes him worse than Mavropanos, at least he fronts up, which can lead to mistakes. Kilman doesn't, so it doesn't get highlighted.
We've obviously got a massive overhaul in the summer, but for me, he is the biggest problem in our team and we need to cut our losses if we can. It took a while to spot, because he hides, but you can't fool people for too long. Wolves fans told us, some wouldn't have it, but they were dead right. Absolute fraud of a player.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3926
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 782 times
-
southbankbornnbred
- Posts: 1495
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 376 times
- Been liked: 567 times
Re: Max Kilman
When he leaves West Ham, in around 2031, it should become a local bank holiday.
Like Independence Day.
Like Independence Day.
-
southbankbornnbred
- Posts: 1495
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 376 times
- Been liked: 567 times
Re: Max Kilman
He can’t run.
He can’t tackle.
He can’t head.
He can’t jump.
He can’t mark space.
He can’t man mark.
He’s painfully slow.
He turns like an oil tanker.
He has no awareness.
He’s not strong for his size.
He’s not brave.
He has no leadership.
He’s not a threat at set pieces.
Except to our own team.
He’s the worst £40m footballer I’ve ever seen. Anywhere. And he’s on 100k a week for another six seasons because of the fucknuts who run this place.
Genuinely, I’d like to know what we “thought” we were buying.
For my money, our worst signing of all time. Truly, calamitously hopeless. And a reflection of everything that has been wrong at the club in recent years.
He can’t tackle.
He can’t head.
He can’t jump.
He can’t mark space.
He can’t man mark.
He’s painfully slow.
He turns like an oil tanker.
He has no awareness.
He’s not strong for his size.
He’s not brave.
He has no leadership.
He’s not a threat at set pieces.
Except to our own team.
He’s the worst £40m footballer I’ve ever seen. Anywhere. And he’s on 100k a week for another six seasons because of the fucknuts who run this place.
Genuinely, I’d like to know what we “thought” we were buying.
For my money, our worst signing of all time. Truly, calamitously hopeless. And a reflection of everything that has been wrong at the club in recent years.
-
Percy Dalton
- Posts: 369
- Old WHO Number: 276654
- Has liked: 244 times
- Been liked: 53 times
Re: Max Kilman
Awful just awful, for the money spent it's absolutely scandalous. Was he any good at Wolves or is it a case of another player turning to shit when joining us? I'd play Soucek at centre back instead, at least Tomas would put his body on the line. Throw in the god awful Todibo as well. Remember hearing from somewhere we had signed a special player in Todibo, is that as in needs?! I am sure we bought the wrong player, the guy we must have been after is playing somewhere else right now and we are left with this sorry excuse for a defender. The two of them are worse than Callum Davenport and Gary Breen.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3926
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 782 times
Re: Max Kilman
He'd be the last player on the team sheet for me. And I'd have gone through the U21's and U18's squads before I would then have to call on him.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3599
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 906 times
- Been liked: 1304 times
Re: Max Kilman
Another totally weak performance from this snowflake. The geezer has absolutely nothing about him. Isn’t mentally or physically strong enough to play at this level add to that his general technical ability and pace is also way below what you need and you have a terrible CB. We won’t get 10m for this bloke
Re: Max Kilman
Great admirer of Glazner. We should have got him when we had the chance but doubt our owners even heard of him even though his Frankfurt side knocked us out of the EL semis ...thanks Cresswell. For him to be in for Kilman seems strange and poor judgement. Lets hope it's true.
btw I think Glasner has not signed a new contract. He could be off to a big club and this is not his signing request.
btw I think Glasner has not signed a new contract. He could be off to a big club and this is not his signing request.
-
Gary Strodders shank
- Posts: 964
- Old WHO Number: 304873
- Has liked: 15 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Re: Max Kilman
Billy Blagg" wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025, 08:46eusebiovic wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025, 10:25 I live just down the hill from Crystal Palace and can deliver him personally to Selhurst Park...I'll even chuck in a complimentary jerk chicken lunch deal... it's very good around these parts so maybe Antonio can come along for the ride as well...Make sure you drive though OK?
I'll get my mate to drop him off in his dial a ride bus if you Iike.
It would be kind of ironic considering how we were taken for one in paying 40m for him
Wolves should get that transfer fee confiscated under the proceeds of crime act.
It would be kind of ironic considering how we were taken for one in paying 40m for him
Wolves should get that transfer fee confiscated under the proceeds of crime act.
-
Billy Blagg
- Posts: 141
- Old WHO Number: 10135
- Has liked: 63 times
- Been liked: 73 times
Re: Max Kilman
eusebiovic wrote: ↑12 Oct 2025, 10:25 I live just down the hill from Crystal Palace and can deliver him personally to Selhurst Park...I'll even chuck in a complimentary jerk chicken lunch deal... it's very good around these parts so maybe Antonio can come along for the ride as well...
Make sure you drive though OK?
-
Gary Strodders shank
- Posts: 964
- Old WHO Number: 304873
- Has liked: 15 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Re: Max Kilman
They don't appear to of invested it too well so far what with being relegated from the NL.
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1020
- Has liked: 161 times
- Been liked: 467 times
-
pulhampete
- Posts: 58
- Old WHO Number: 17289
- Has liked: 65 times
- Been liked: 13 times
-
Gary Strodders shank
- Posts: 964
- Old WHO Number: 304873
- Has liked: 15 times
- Been liked: 160 times
Re: Max Kilman
Do we have to pay Wolves a sell on ? 
The worst transfer deal for a defender that I can recall.
I can't remember one single decent performance and no redeeming features.
The polar opposite to Dawson who's stock was low cost next to nothing and produced time and again in both boxes.
Never let us down as far as i know
The worst transfer deal for a defender that I can recall.
I can't remember one single decent performance and no redeeming features.
The polar opposite to Dawson who's stock was low cost next to nothing and produced time and again in both boxes.
Never let us down as far as i know
-
eusebiovic
- Posts: 501
- Old WHO Number: 15391
- Has liked: 928 times
- Been liked: 177 times
Re: Max Kilman
I live just down the hill from Crystal Palace and can deliver him personally to Selhurst Park...I'll even chuck in a complimentary jerk chicken lunch deal... it's very good around these parts so maybe Antonio can come along for the ride as well...
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1020
- Has liked: 161 times
- Been liked: 467 times
Re: Max Kilman
Obviously we would all drive him there because we watch him every week, but how the mighty have fallen, with the press linking our 1st team regulars to Crystal fucking Palace.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1778
- Has liked: 447 times
- Been liked: 719 times
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3710
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 184 times
- Been liked: 1018 times
Re: Max Kilman
First one mainly seen as Sullivan obstinately wanted Lop so it probably would have been a bit of a fuck you to Stiedten- worked out well eh. Unless he also happened to have a ‘friendly’ agent.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5025
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: Max Kilman
I still can't make any sense of Sullivan sanctioning this transfer under such ludicrous terms unless:
- It was a non-negotiable condition of Loopy-Lou signing, or,
- It involves well stuffed, tax-evading brown envelopes discretely hidden behind the left luggage lockers at Victoria coach station on a regular basis, or,
- All of the above.