Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Who is our worst signing?

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Nutsin
Posts: 2763
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 170 times
Been liked: 299 times

Fullkrug Who is our worst signing?

Post Nutsin »

I’ve got Kieran Dyer.

Who you got?
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 450
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 197 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

And Rebrov.

Shevchenko was another one, although he was brilliant at Milan, and Chelsea have had a long habit of turning top strikers into shit players.
eusebiovic
Posts: 464
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 878 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post eusebiovic »

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: 02 Nov 2025, 10:56 Yeah, but the point I was making was that we couldn't have known that Yarmolenko would turn out to be made of glass based on his career up to then. I reckon he'd missed far fewer games through injury than the majority of players we've signed in their late 20s. We shouldn't have bought him anyway though. He obviously wasn't suited to the pace and physicality of the Premier League. 
Yeah it's a fair point.

Historically it's always been a well known fact that players from Russia or also now Ukraine have always been underwhelming whatever top league they get a transfer too whether it's here or Italy, Spain whatever.

Remember Arshevin at Arsenal? 
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 450
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 197 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

Yeah, but the point I was making was that we couldn't have known that Yarmolenko would turn out to be made of glass based on his career up to then. I reckon he'd missed far fewer games through injury than the majority of players we've signed in their late 20s. We shouldn't have bought him anyway though. He obviously wasn't suited to the pace and physicality of the Premier League. 
eusebiovic
Posts: 464
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 878 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post eusebiovic »

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: 02 Nov 2025, 10:28 Oh, I see what you did. That article you linked had a paragraph about Konoplyanka, who did play for Schalke and Sevilla, and you conflated the two players.

Reading comprehension - you just can't beat it.
OK - I fucked that one up

Never post before I've had my coffee.

Yarmolenko was still a bit flakey though but I guess the history of our club has always somebody else's cast-offs.
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 450
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 197 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

Oh, I see what you did. That article you linked had a paragraph about Konoplyanka, who did play for Schalke and Sevilla, and you conflated the two players.

Reading comprehension - you just can't beat it.
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 450
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 197 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

He never played for Sevilla. Or Schalke. You seem to be confusing him with someone else.
eusebiovic
Posts: 464
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 878 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post eusebiovic »

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: 02 Nov 2025, 08:35 Well, I wasted a few minutes reading that article which goes on about how he wasn't good enough for Dortmund (exactly I said) and made no mention at all about his fitness (why would it, seeing as he'd never had an injury in his whole career at that time), so I don't know what made you put that link up unless it was to agree with what I said and admit you were talking nonsense.
I just remember when he signed an-ex manager in Germany saying he didn't work enough on his fitness - that is all. Maybe he just took longer to recover and get up to full speed after an injury was the gist of the message.

He played for Sevilla and was underwhelming there and didn't settle (it's too hot) and at Schalke he was O.K but didn't pull up any trees as the twitchy one might've said. His one season at Dortmund was largely the same. The odd good game punctuated by a few average ones then an injury or two and time on the bench.

Which is more or less how it panned out for us as well. Was it true he was on 115k a week? I remember a figure in that ballpark.

The point is with the way our club is run we rarely, if ever get value for money regarding the transfer fee and wages spent.

I think everyone is sick to death of it tbh.

That was the point.
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 450
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 197 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

Well, I wasted a few minutes reading that article which goes on about how he wasn't good enough for Dortmund (exactly I said) and made no mention at all about his fitness (why would it, seeing as he'd never had an injury in his whole career at that time), so I don't know what made you put that link up unless it was to agree with what I said and admit you were talking nonsense.
eusebiovic
Posts: 464
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 878 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post eusebiovic »

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: 02 Nov 2025, 07:22
eusebiovic wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 19:14
He got bombed out of Dortmund for not being fit enough to play Bundesliga so I don't know why anybody expected his body to consistently hold together in the Prem.

 
Where'd you get that from? He missed about 8 games for them with a foot injury the season he was there. Prior to that he'd never had a single injury in his whole career and had already played well over 300 games for Dynamo Kiev. He didn't have physical issues until he came here. Fuck knows what we do to players. The reason he got "bombed out" of Dortmund was probably because he wasn't good enough for them, and they had Pulisic becoming a 1st team regular so didn't need to replace him.
https://www.espn.co.uk/football/story/_ ... y-too-late

Due diligence and research - you just can't beat it.
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 450
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 197 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

eusebiovic wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 19:14
He got bombed out of Dortmund for not being fit enough to play Bundesliga so I don't know why anybody expected his body to consistently hold together in the Prem.
 
Where'd you get that from? He missed about 8 games for them with a foot injury the season he was there. Prior to that he'd never had a single injury in his whole career and had already played well over 300 games for Dynamo Kiev. He didn't have physical issues until he came here. Fuck knows what we do to players. The reason he got "bombed out" of Dortmund was probably because he wasn't good enough for them, and they had Pulisic becoming a 1st team regular so didn't need to replace him.
Sydney_Iron
Posts: 1952
Old WHO Number: 33051
Has liked: 176 times
Been liked: 379 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Sydney_Iron »

Worst signing EVER, has to be the one that moved us from UP to the rented Athletics bowl?

End of thread.
 
Massive Attack
Posts: 6153
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3526 times
Been liked: 1831 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Massive Attack »

It says around £9M but remember it being £10M reported at the time, either way still a fuck load of money trusted on him to produce big results. His career now as it was at the time is 1 of a charlatan. 

https://talksport.com/football/2836031/ ... tsigation/

We never, ever fucking learn...🤑
eusebiovic
Posts: 464
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 878 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post eusebiovic »

El Scorchio" wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 20:03
eusebiovic wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 19:14 I just remembered another one...

Despite his goal against Sevilla and the double whammy against Chelsea being notable Yarmolenko was well off the pace and largely a disappointment considering his wages and fitness issues. £18M quid for a bloke who rarely featured.

He got bombed out of Dortmund for not being fit enough to play Bundesliga so I don't know why anybody expected his body to consistently hold together in the Prem.

He was good for about 5 goals - I remember another double against Everton but that was about it. 
Yarmo wasn’t that bad when fit. He got a couple of serious injuries anx scored some really priceless goals and some screamers for us. The one against Sevilla was just an awesome moment which was just after his return from compassionate leave after the invasion- his first game back being the Villa game where he also scored the winner and that was quite the emotional moment as well. 
I liked him - obviously a truly skillful player but another example of taking a punt on somebody with physical issues and see how it falls.

We continue to do this when so many other clubs have bypassed this out of date, throw the plate against the wall mentality and see what sticks by having a far superior recruitment model.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3622
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 974 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post El Scorchio »

eusebiovic wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 19:14 I just remembered another one...

Despite his goal against Sevilla and the double whammy against Chelsea being notable Yarmolenko was well off the pace and largely a disappointment considering his wages and fitness issues. £18M quid for a bloke who rarely featured.

He got bombed out of Dortmund for not being fit enough to play Bundesliga so I don't know why anybody expected his body to consistently hold together in the Prem.

He was good for about 5 goals - I remember another double against Everton but that was about it. 
Yarmo wasn’t that bad when fit. He got a couple of serious injuries anx scored some really priceless goals and some screamers for us. The one against Sevilla was just an awesome moment which was just after his return from compassionate leave after the invasion- his first game back being the Villa game where he also scored the winner and that was quite the emotional moment as well. 
Massive Attack
Posts: 6153
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3526 times
Been liked: 1831 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Massive Attack »

eusebiovic wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 19:57
Massive Attack" wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 19:54 I can't see how we can ever seriously look past Savio Nsereko. He clearly was never a Footballer and were sold an absolute pup without making sure the Club did it's due diligence on the fraud footballer before parting company with £10M big ones. 

The horrible little cսnt even faked his own hostage claim so he could get thousands out of his own family! Sums the fraud up and we were mug enough as a so called top flight Professional Football Club who couldn't afford to waste much around that time. 

£10M back in 2009 remember. That's an incredible amount of money back then to spunk on someone knew fuck all about. 

Think it was that fat iti twat Gianluca Nani (another useless Director of Football) who convinced us to buy him. cսnt should be locked up for defrauding us.
Yep 100% 

Absolutely scandalous how nobody got prosecuted for a blatant scam. 

Disgraceful 😡🤬

Out of curiosity I just looked up and edited the record transfer of the time Ronaldo went to Real Madrid from Man Utd for £80M! Fucking shocking! 🤣
eusebiovic
Posts: 464
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 878 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post eusebiovic »

Massive Attack" wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 19:54 I can't see how we can ever seriously look past Savio Nsereko. He clearly was never a Footballer and were sold an absolute pup without making sure the Club did it's due diligence on the fraud footballer before parting company with £10M big ones. 

The horrible little cսnt even faked his own hostage claim so he could get thousands out of his own family! Sums the fraud up and we were mug enough as a so called top flight Professional Football Club who couldn't afford to waste much around that time. 

£10M back in 2009 remember. That's an incredible amount of money back then to spunk on someone knew fuck all about. 

Think it was that fat iti twat Gianluca Nani (another useless Director of Football) who convinced us to buy him. cսnt should be locked up for defrauding us.
Yep 100% 

Absolutely scandalous how nobody got prosecuted for a blatant scam. 

Disgraceful 😡🤬
Massive Attack
Posts: 6153
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3526 times
Been liked: 1831 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Massive Attack »

I can't see how we can ever seriously look past Savio Nsereko. He clearly was never a Footballer and were sold an absolute pup without making sure the Club did it's due diligence on the fraud footballer before parting company with £10M big ones. 

The horrible little cսnt even faked his own hostage claim so he could get thousands out of his own family! Sums the fraud up and we were mug enough as a so called top flight Professional Football Club who couldn't afford to waste much around that time. 

£10M back in 2009 remember. That's an incredible amount of money back then to spunk on someone knew fuck all about. Just to put that in to perspective, one Cristiano Ronaldo went for a world record transfer around the same time from Man Utd to Real Madrid for £80M. 

Think it was that fat iti twat Gianluca Nani (another useless Director of Football) who convinced us to buy him. Another fraud in Football stealing a living. cսnt should be locked up for defrauding us.
Last edited by Massive Attack on 01 Nov 2025, 19:57, edited 1 time in total.
eusebiovic
Posts: 464
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 878 times
Been liked: 164 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post eusebiovic »

I just remembered another one...

Despite his goal against Sevilla and the double whammy against Chelsea being notable Yarmolenko was well off the pace and largely a disappointment considering his wages and fitness issues. £18M quid for a bloke who rarely featured.

He got bombed out of Dortmund for not being fit enough to play Bundesliga so I don't know why anybody expected his body to consistently hold together in the Prem.

He was good for about 5 goals - I remember another double against Everton but that was about it. 
User avatar
Sweep
Posts: 33
Has liked: 7 times
Been liked: 5 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Sweep »

Could argue Bobby Ferguson and Pedro Obiang because they were chosen instead of Gordon Banks and N'Golo Kante.
Jean-Luc Paul Goddard
Posts: 450
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 197 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Jean-Luc Paul Goddard »

Ashley Fletcher was shit for us but we got him on a free and sold him for £6.5m a year later. In the current regime that puts him as one of our best signings.
nychammer
Posts: 1727
Old WHO Number: 220458
Has liked: 51 times
Been liked: 223 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post nychammer »

Eastside surge" wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 13:39 Can’t remember how much he cost but I always thought Hernández was a complete waste of time and the same with Ashley fletcher but can’t remember if he was simply on loan 
Hernandez scored a few goals for us, considerably more than a few expensive duds and certainly multiples more than the german cripple. 
Eastside surge
Posts: 133
Old WHO Number: 213924
Has liked: 49 times
Been liked: 29 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Eastside surge »

Can’t remember how much he cost but I always thought Hernández was a complete waste of time and the same with Ashley fletcher but can’t remember if he was simply on loan 
honky cat
Posts: 1130
Has liked: 635 times
Been liked: 432 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post honky cat »

El Scorchio" wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 10:50
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 09:16 Looks like it would be quite easy to put a "Worst team...ever!" XI (or even XXVI) together...
A worst team before Sullivan vs a worst team after Sullivan would be interesting. The post Sullivan one will probably be worse and multitudes more expensive 
You're probably right but with Boogers for example he was only £1m, but it was almost half the transfer spend that season, so in todays world it would have been a £50m disaster.

Lets face it we've always been shit at buying players.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3622
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 175 times
Been liked: 974 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post El Scorchio »

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: 01 Nov 2025, 09:16 Looks like it would be quite easy to put a "Worst team...ever!" XI (or even XXVI) together...
A worst team before Sullivan vs a worst team after Sullivan would be interesting. The post Sullivan one will probably be worse and multitudes more expensive 






User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4818
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 34 times
Been liked: 619 times

Re: Who is our worst signing?

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Looks like it would be quite easy to put a "Worst team...ever!" XI (or even XXVI) together...
Post Reply